Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Therapeutic Strategy in Spinocerebellar Ataxia: Current status and proposed Clinical Intervention Protocol

Authors

  • Francisco Rivera CENIT Foundation for Neuroscience Research. Autonomous City of Buenos Aires. Argentina. https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8979-1906
  • Alejandro Idraste CENIT Foundation for Neuroscience Research. Autonomous City of Buenos Aires. Argentina.
  • José Luis Etcheverry CENIT Foundation for Neuroscience Research. Autonomous City of Buenos Aires. Argentina.
  • Fabián César Piedimonte CENIT Foundation for Neuroscience Research. Autonomous City of Buenos Aires. Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4661-4449
  • Franco Moscovicz CENIT Foundation for Neuroscience Research. Autonomous City of Buenos Aires. Argentina. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1038-6210

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget2026606

Keywords:

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, spinocerebellar ataxias, neuromodulation, cerebellum, synaptic plasticity, neurorehabilitation, cerebellar iTBS

Abstract

Introduction: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a noninvasive neuromodulation strategy with therapeutic potential in disorders characterized by cerebellar dysfunction, including spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), for which no curative or effective pharmacological treatments currently exist. By modulating neuronal excitability and promoting activity-dependent synaptic plasticity, rTMS may optimize cortico-cerebellar circuits involved in motor coordination and balance.
Methods: We present a literature review of rTMS application in SCAs and report preliminary clinical experience in a pilot cohort of four patients with different SCA subtypes treated with an adapted cerebellar intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) protocol. Stimulation was delivered over the cerebellar vermis and bilateral hemispheres during 15 consecutive daily sessions. Clinical response was assessed using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) at baseline and immediately after treatment. Pre–post differences were analyzed using a paired Student’s t-test (α = 0.05).
Results: The cohort included four female patients (39–77 years) with SCA17, SCA3, AE2, and ATP2B3. A mean reduction of 6 points in total SARA score was observed following treatment (p = 0.016). Improvements were more pronounced in upper-limb coordination subdomains, with a trend toward gait improvement. No moderate or severe adverse events occurred; transient fatigue and mild headache were reported in some patients.
Discussion: These findings support the feasibility and safety of a standardized cerebellar iTBS protocol in SCAs and suggest clinically meaningful improvements, particularly in appendicular coordination. Variability across stimulation protocols in the literature underscores the need for standardization, identification of response predictors, and integration with structured neurorehabilitation strategies.
Conclusions: Cerebellar rTMS delivered through an adapted iTBS protocol was associated with clinically relevant SARA improvements and a favorable safety profile in this pilot series. Larger controlled studies with longer follow-up are required to establish efficacy, durability of effects, and optimal patient selection criteria.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Wang Y, Zhang Y, Liu L, et al. The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1049813.

Moscovicz F. Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal. Introducción a sus principios y fundamentos. NeuroTarget. 2024;18(1):62-71.

Kricheldorff J, Göke K, Kiebs M, et al. Evidence of neuroplastic changes after transcranial magnetic, electric, and deep brain stimulation. Brain Sci. 2022;12(7):929.

Ziemann U. Thirty years of transcranial magnetic stimulation: where do we stand? Exp Brain Res. 2017;235:973-84.

Cook AA, Fields E, Watt AJ. Losing the beat: contribution of Purkinje cell firing dysfunction to disease, and its reversal. Neuroscience. 2021;462:247-61.

Marsden J, Harris C. Cerebellar ataxia: pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(3):195-216.

Klockgether T, Mariotti C, Paulson HL. Spinocerebellar ataxia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):24.

Klockgether T. Sporadic ataxia with adult onset: classification and diagnostic criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(1):94-104.

He M, Zhang HN, Tang ZC, Gao SG. Balance and coordination training for patients with genetic degenerative ataxia: a systematic review. J Neurol. 2021;268(10):3690-705.

Mitoma H, Manto M. The era of cerebellar therapy. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2019;17(1):3-6.

Grimaldi G, Argyropoulos GP, Bastian A, et al. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS): a novel approach to understanding cerebellar function in health and disease. Neuroscientist. 2016;22(1):83-97.

Farzan F, Wu Y, Manor B, et al. Cerebellar TMS in treatment of a patient with cerebellar ataxia: evidence from clinical, biomechanics and neurophysiological assessments. Cerebellum. 2013;12(5):707-12.

Song W, Amer A, Tsoyi K. The role of TMS in therapeutic neuromodulation. J Magn. 2020;22:625-9.

Chen XY, Lian YH, Liu XH, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cerebellar metabolism in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3: evidence from magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Cerebellum. 2022;21(4):589-600.

Ihara Y, Takata H, Tanabe Y, et al. Influence of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on disease severity in patients with spinocerebellar degeneration. Kobe J Med Sci. 2005;51:59-64.

Fierro B, Giglia G, Palermo A, Pecoraro C, Scalia S, Brighina F. Modulatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS over the cerebellum on motor cortex excitability. Exp Brain Res. 2007;176:440-7.

Wang Y, Zhang D, Wang J, Ma J, Lu L, Jin S. Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1049813.

Lin YC, Kuo SH, Lin CP, Chang LH. The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Chin Med Assoc. 2025;88(6):417-25.

Benussi A, Pascual-Leone A, Borroni B. Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation in neurodegenerative ataxia: a literature review. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(6):1948.

Grobe-Einsler M, Bork F, Faikus A, Hurlemann R, Kaut O. Effects of cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus physiotherapy in spinocerebellar ataxias—a randomized clinical trial. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024;30:e14797.

Sanna A, Follesa P, Tacconi P, et al. Therapeutic use of cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in neurological diseases. Cerebellum. 2021;20(3):465-81.

Schmitz-Hübsch T, du Montcel ST, Baliko L, et al. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Neurology. 2006;66:1717-20.

Ciricugno A, Paternò S, Barbati N, et al. Advances in cerebellar TMS therapy: an updated systematic review on multi-session interventions. Biomedicines. 2025;13:1578.

Taylor JJ, Newberger NG, Stern AP, et al. Seizure risk with repetitive TMS: survey results from over a half-million treatment sessions. Brain Stimul. 2021;14(4):965-73.

Published

2026-05-05

How to Cite

1.
Rivera F, Idraste A, Etcheverry JL, Piedimonte FC, Moscovicz F. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Therapeutic Strategy in Spinocerebellar Ataxia: Current status and proposed Clinical Intervention Protocol. NeuroTarget [Internet]. 2026 May 5 [cited 2026 May 15];20(1):30-6. Available from: https://neurotarget.com/index.php/nt/article/view/606