Bilateral Centromedian Thalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation for Epilepsy in Children and Adults. 32 Cases and One Spectral Analysis Local Field Potentials During Emotional Stimuli
WSSFN 2025 Interim Meeting. Abstract 0136.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget2025573Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the centromedian (CM) nucleus of the thalamus in 32 cases in a heterogeneous population of children and adults with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) performed in a single center in Hospital San Vicente Fundacion Rionegro Colombia. We also analized the last patient who was implanted with Percept PC battery that allow record local field potential from the centromedianos nucleos In this patient, LFPs were analyzed during both emotional discrimination and motor tasks, providing novel insights into thalamocortical network dynamics in epilepsy. These recordings revealed task-specific oscillatory patterns that may serve as potential biomarkers for future closed-loop neuromodulation strategies.
Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 32 patients treated between 2017 and 2024. The primary outcomes included seizure frequency, seizure-free days, and quality of life, while surgical complications and mortality were also assessed. We also analyzes local field potentials (LFPs) in one of the patient who underwent percept PC battery. The recordings were obtained during a task involving the presentation of emotional images (five happy and five sad), with the DBS stimulator turned ON. Signals were segmented according to image presentation times and analyzed using Welch’s method. A 1/f correction was applied to the power spectra to compensate for the natural decline in power at higher frequencies.
Results: The general results of DBS demonstrated a significant reduction in seizure frequency, from an average of 331.97 to 21.63 seizures per month (p = 0.001), representing a 93.45% median reduction. Seizure-free days increased from 9.1 to 60.77 days per month (p = 0.012), and 83% of patients reported improved life satisfaction. Device-related infections occurred in 9.3% of patients, and three deaths unrelated to DBS were recorded. In the patient implanted with percept PC, LFPs were analyzed during both emotional discrimination and motor tasks, providing novel insights into thalamocortical network dynamics in epilepsy. These recordings revealed task-specific oscillatory patterns that may serve as potential biomarkers for future closed-loop neuromodulation strategies.
Discussion: In both hemispheres, DBS ON is associated with increased low-frequency power (especially in theta and alpha bands), suggesting enhanced thalamic responsiveness to positive emotional stimuli under stimulation.The DBS ON condition reveals increased power in both hemispheres, particularly in the low-frequency range (1–5 Hz) and mid-frequency range (15–25 Hz), suggesting that stimulation enhances thalamic responsiveness to emotionally salient stimuli. In contrast, the DBS OFF condition shows reduced spectral power, indicating diminished thalamocortical engagement during passive emotional processing. These findings suggest that DBS in the centromedian thalamus does more than suppress seizures—it may also restore or enhance physiological oscillations that are otherwise dormant or disrupted in epilepsy. The reactivation of low-frequency and mid-frequency bands could reflect a normalization of thalamocortical communication, which is critical for both conscious awareness and emotional processing.
Conclusions: The findings support CM-DBS as a safe and effective therapeutic option for DRE, with significant improvements in seizure control and quality of life. The integration of Percept RC technology opens new avenues for personalized, biomarker-guided DBS programming. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these results and explore the long-term benefits of adaptive neuromodulation in epilepsy.
Metrics
References
Fisher RS, Salanova V, Witt T, et al. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010;51(5):899-908.
García Navarro V, Valentín A, García Navarrete E, et al. Centromedian thalamic nuclei deep brain stimulation in epilepsy. Rev Neurol. 2014;59(1):31-38.
Tyvaert L, Chassagnon S, Sadikot A, LeVan P, Dubeau F, Gotman J. Thalamic nuclei activity in idiopathic generalized epilepsy: an EEG-fMRI study. Neurology 2009;73:2018-2022
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X Qual Life Res 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-1736
Velasco F, Velasco M, Velasco AL, et al. Electrical stimulation for epilepsy: Thalamic targets. Front Biosci. 2009;14:712-738.
Kwan P, Arzimanoglou A, Berg AT, Brodie MJ, Allen Hauser W, Mathern G, et al. Defnition of drug resistant epilepsy: consensus proposal by the ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia 2010;51:1069-1077.
Valentín A, García Navarrete E, Chelvarajah R, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the centromedian thalamic nuclei for patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2013;54(10):1823-1833.
Yang AI, Raghu ALB, Isbaine F, Alwaki A, Gross RE. Sensing with deep brain stimulation device in epilepsy: Aperiodic changes in thalamic local field potential during seizures. Epilepsia. 2023;64(11):3025-3035. doi: 10.1111/epi.17758.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adriana Lucia Lopez Rios, Carlos Anibal Restrepo Bravo, Luisa Fernanda Ahunca Velasquez, Daniel Henao Lopez, Manuela Pelaez Soto , Carlos Ignacio Velez Arango, William Duncan Hutchison, Juan Sebastian Saavedra Moreno

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
