The use of Inertial Sensor Based System for Objective Assessment of Tremor in Parkinson’s Disease

WSSFN 2025 Interim Meeting. Abstract 0099.

Authors

  • Nicoly Augusta Da Silva Quezada Dos Santos Fluminense Federal Universitiy. Brazil.
  • José Geraldo Medeiros Netto Fluminense Federal Universitiy. Brazil.
  • Clara Costa Fluminense Federal Universitiy. Brazil.
  • Caio Araujo De Souza Fluminense Federal Universitiy. Brazil.
  • Rosana Siqueira Brown Fluminense Federal Universitiy. Brazil.
  • Ariana Moura Cabral Fluminense Federal Universitiy. Brazil.
  • Adriano De Oliveira Andrade Fluminense Federal Universitiy. Brazil.
  • Bruno Lima Pessôa Fluminense Federal Universitiy. Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget2025544

Abstract

Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative condition characterized by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, with a significant impact on public health, particularly among the elderly. Despite the criterias for clinical diagnosis, there is no standardized approach for early diagnosis or continuous and objective assessment of tremor progression in PD. The current methods rely on subjective and limited assessments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of inertial sensor-based systems in assessing tremor progression and fluctuations in PD.
Method: This study involved 12 PD patients and 12 healthy controls, assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the TREMSEN system, a inertial sensor-based device developed for high-resolution, objective quantification of tremor in clinical research.
Results: The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed statistically significant differences in tremor amplitude (p < 0.05) between at least two of the groups (PD-OFF, PD-ON, controls) on both sides for all three spatial axes. In anteroposterior axis, Wilcoxon tests for multiple comparisons demonstrated significant differences observed for all comparison pairs during the posture maintenance task, the second resting period, the wrist adduction-abduction task, and the third resting period on both sides (p < 0.05). Spearman’s correlation for tremor amplitude exhibited a significant correlation with the clinical assessment scale (p < 0.05).
Discussion: The results indicated that TREMSEN was effective in differentiating tremor between the groups, especially during rest and postural tasks, proving to be useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of PD. The correlation between tremor magnitude and the UPDRS scale suggests that the system can objectively reflect tremor severity.
Conclusions: The findings reinforce the usefulness of TREMSEN in quantifying tremor and indicate the relevance of future studies on motor fluctuations with inertial sensors.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Halli-Tierney AD, Luker J, Carroll DG. Parkinson Disease. Am Fam Physician. 2020 Dec 1;102(11):679–91.

Berg D, Postuma RB, Bloem B, Chan P, Dubois B, Gasser T, et al. Time to redefine PD? Introductory statement of the MDS Task Force on the definition of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2014;29(4):454–62.

Su D, Cui Y, He C, Yin P, Bai R, Zhu J, et al. Projections for prevalence of Parkinson’s disease and its driving factors in 195 countries and territories to 2050: modelling study of Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. BMJ. 2025;388:e080952.

Armstrong MJ, Okun MS. Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson Disease: A Review. JAMA. 2020 Feb;323(6):548–60.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-18

How to Cite

1.
Da Silva Quezada Dos Santos NA, Medeiros Netto JG, Costa C, Araujo De Souza C, Siqueira Brown R, Moura Cabral A, et al. The use of Inertial Sensor Based System for Objective Assessment of Tremor in Parkinson’s Disease: WSSFN 2025 Interim Meeting. Abstract 0099. NeuroTarget [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 18 [cited 2025 Nov. 27];19(2):75. Available from: https://neurotarget.com/index.php/nt/article/view/544

Issue

Section

Conference Abstracts