Neurostimulation in special situations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget2008346Keywords:
spinal cord stimulation, complex painAbstract
Despite of almost forty years of successful clinical application, several issues remain controversial in spinal cord stimulation yet. Among them can be included the mechanisms of action involved, the most appropriate selection criteria of patients, the duration of the therapeutic trial, the best outcome assessment, and so on.
However, there is an issue of agreement: the absolute need of over imposing neurostimulation induced paresthesias with the location of pain.
This goal is not always easy to achieve. Sometimes the reasons are some anatomic factors, sometimes due to clinical characteristics.
This review deals about the state of art of to achieve the most successful overlapping in special clinical situations.
Metrics
References
North RB, Ewend MG, Lawton MT, Piantadosi S. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: superiority of "multi-channel" devices. Pain. 1991 Feb;44(2):119-30.
North RB, Kidd DH, Zahurak M, James CS, Long DM. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: experience over two decades. Neurosurgery. 1993 Mar;32(3):384-94.
Barolat G, Massaro F, He J, Zeme S, Ketcik B. Mapping of sensory responses to epidural stimulation of the intraspinal neural structures in man. J Neurosurg. 1993 Feb;78(2):233-9.
Barolat G. Current status of epidural spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurg Quarterly. 1995; 5(2):98-124.
Law JD. A new method for targeting a spinal stimulator: quantitatively paired comparisons. Appl Neurophysiol. 1987;50(1-6):436.
Holsheimer J, Wesselink WA. Optimum electrode geometry for spinal cord stimulation: the narrow bipole and tripole. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1997 Sep;35(5):493-7.
Slavin KV, Christian Wess C. Trigeminal Branch Stimulation for Intractable Neuropathic Pain: Technical Note. Neuromodulation. 2005 Jan;8(1):7-13.
Aló KM, Esperanza Mckay E. Selective Nerve Root Stimulation (SNRS) for the Treatment of Intractable Pelvic Pain and Motor Dysfunction: A Case Report. Neuromodulation. 2001 Jan;4(1):19-23.
North RB. Spinal cord and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: Technical Aspects. In: Simpson BA, editor. Pain Research and Clinical Management Series, Volume 15. Electrical Stimulation and the Relief of Pain. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2003. p. 183-195.
Barolat G, Oakley JC, Law JD, North RB, Ketcik B, Sharan A. Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation with a Multiple Electrode Paddle Lead Is Effective in Treating Intractable Low Back Pain. Neuromodulation. 2001 Apr;4(2):59-66.
Holsheimer J, Nuttin B, King GW, Wesselink WA, Gybels JM, de Sutter P. Clinical evaluation of paresthesia steering with a new system for spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery. 1998 Mar;42(3):541-7.
Villavicencio AT, Leveque JC, Rubin L, Bulsara K, Gorecki JP. Laminectomy versus percutaneous electrode placement for spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2000 Feb;46(2):399-405.
North RB, Kidd DH, Olin JC, Sieracki JM. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous and laminectomy electrodes-part I: technical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2002 Aug;51(2):381-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2008 Roberto Fabián Rodríguez
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.