Gamma-Tetha Local Field Potentials as Biomarkers in Treatment Resistant Depression on Bilateral Subgenual Corpus Callosum Deep Brain Stimulation. Integrated Behavioral, Neurophysiological and Clinical Effects
WSSFN 2025 Interim Meeting. Abstract 0102.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget2025545Resumen
Introduction: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains a significant therapeutic challenge globally. Although (DBS) has been an option for treatment, some suggests that a personalized approach base on main symptomatology and individual biomarkers, may yield more efficacious outcomes. Since 2013, our center at Rionegro San Vicente Fundacion Hospital Colombia, South America, has implemented a multidisciplinary neurofunctional program and performed bilateral subcallosal cingulate DBS (SCC-DBS) in 7 patients. Recently, 3 of these patients underwent device replacement with the PerceptTM RC neurostimulator Brain SenseTM technology, enabling advanced local field potential (LFP) recordings and behavioral and neurophysiological assessments. This study focuses on these 3 patients, each representing a distinct depressive phenotype: hypersensitive, stable, and anhedonic. We conducted comprehensive evaluations integrating emotional perception tasks, local field potential recordings, and longitudinal clinical profiling to elucidate the mechanisms and effects of SCC-DBS.
Method: EMOTIONAL PERCEPTION TASK Patients viewed 10 standardized images 5 happy 5 sad in randomized order during two conditions stimON Chronic therapeutic stimulation and stim-OFF: 1 hour washout period. For each image, patients provided: Happiness rating 1 very sad to 10 very happy semantic association single-word descriptor and response latency measurement.
Results: Behaviorally, SCC-DBS significantly enhanced positive image perception +9.5% and reduced negative bias −28% with a 34% improvement in emotional discrimination capacity. Neurophysiologically, stimulation led to increased gamma oscillations up to +175% suppressed theta activity up to −41.9% strongly correlated with affective improvements r = 0.76 and r = 0.71 respectively). Clinically 49.3% overall improvement in QofL with phenotype specific responses beta/gamma ratio was most effective in the hypersensitive patient theta-alpha phase-amplitude coupling relevant in the stable phenotype and high gamma power was a key biomarker in the anhedonic patient.
Discussion: Our observations suggest that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the (SCC) achieves therapeutic effects through frequency-specific, dissociable mechanisms. Gamma oscillations may facilitate long-term synchronization between the SCC and the nucleus accumbens, enabling positive valence encoding. Pathological theta hyperactivity during StimOFF states may reflect limbic-cortical dysrhythmia, consistent with the Broadway model of depressive hyperarousal. Theta suppression correlated with reduced connectivity between the amygdala and SCC may suggest normalized threat processing. All of this could have clinical application when programming real life patients, but more cases and scenarios are required for applicability across all individuals.
Conclusions: We can suggest that SCC DBS may modulates affective circuits through frequency specific mechanisms gamma enhancement may facilitates positive affect and reward processing, while theta suppression may mitigates negative cognitive bias. The therapeutic response varies by depression phenotype, supporting a personalized neuromodulation approach guided by electrophysiological biomarkers. The use of Percept RC technology may enable real-time monitoring and biomarker identification. This optimized programming framework may have the potential to improve clinical outcomes in TRD and maybe establish SCC DBS as a targeted, phenotype-driven therapy.
Métricas
Citas
Broadway JM, et al. Frontal theta cordance predicts 6-month antidepressant response to subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2018;11(4):829-836.
Donoghue T, et al. Parameterizing neural power spectra into periodic and aperiodic components. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23(12):1655-1665.
Gao R, et al. Inferring synaptic excitation/inhibition balance from field potentials. Neuroimage. 2017;158:70-78.
Holtzheimer PE, et al. Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(11):839-849.
Mayberg HS, et al. Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron. 2005;45(5):651-660.
Riva-Posse P, et al. A connectomic approach for subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation surgery: prospective targeting in treatment-resistant depression. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23(4):843-849.
Scangos KW, et al. Closed-loop neuromodulation in an individual with treatment-resistant depression. Nat Med. 2021;27(10):1696-1700.
Lozano AM, et al. Subcallosal cingulate gyrus deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;80(4):266-275.
Horn A, et al. Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging. Neuroimage. 2017;184:293-316.
Tort AB, et al. Measuring phase-amplitude coupling between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104(2):1195-1210.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Adriana Lucia Lopez Rios, William Duncan Hutchison, Carlos Anibal Restrepo Bravo, Daniel Henao Lopez, Alejandro Aristizabal Gaviria, Luisa Fernanda Ahunca Velasquez, Juan Alexander Escobar Rincon, Jorge Holguin Holguin Lew

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Este artículo se distribuye bajo la licencia Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. A menos que se indique lo contrario, el material publicado asociado se distribuye bajo la misma licencia.
